Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · RCMP External Review Committee

Appeal case reviews

Program code
BXJ01 (ERC)
Core responsibility
Independent review of RCMP employment matters
In Departmental Plans
2019-20 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

Independent reviews of appeals of internal RCMP decisions regarding key employment matters such as dismissals, discharges and harassment complaints, as required by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act. The ERC provides findings and recommendations for a final decision to the Commissioner of the RCMP (or a delegate) and to the parties. If the Commissioner does not follow the ERC’s recommendations, the Act requires the reasons for not doing so to be included in the final decision.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2019-20. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Appeal case reviews 2010-11: $1.5MAppeal case reviews 2011-12: $1.7MAppeal case reviews 2012-13: $1.6MAppeal case reviews 2013-14: $1.6MAppeal case reviews 2014-15: $1.6MAppeal case reviews 2015-16: $1.5MAppeal case reviews 2016-17: $1.5MAppeal case reviews 2017-18: $1.6MAppeal case reviews 2018-19: $2.3MAppeal case reviews 2019-20: $3.4MAppeal case reviews 2020-21: $2.8MAppeal case reviews 2019-20: $3.1MAppeal case reviews 2020-21: $3.2MAppeal case reviews 2021-22: $3.9MAppeal case reviews 2022-23: $4.9MAppeal case reviews 2023-24: $3.9MAppeal case reviews 2024-25: $5MAppeal case reviews 2025-26: $4.8MAppeal case reviews 2026-27: $4.6MAppeal case reviews 2027-28: $4.6MAppeal case reviews 2028-29: $4.5MAppeal case reviewsAppeal case reviews
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Appeal case reviewsEarlier program (name match, high confidence)2010-11 – 2020-21$14.9M
Appeal case reviewsThis program2019-20 – 2028-29$24M

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2019-20Appears to replace Appeal case reviewsCanada Spends name match across plans (an inference)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Frequency of website postings of the latest summaries of ERC findings and recommendations and of RCMP final decisions.
Expected result: RCMP members and the public have access to current information on the issues addressed by the ERC in its reviews.
4%2019-20✓ met66.5%2020-21✓ met84%2021-22✓ met100%2022-23✓ met100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 4%20204%Met
2020-21≥ 4%202166.5%
Website posting of findings and recommendations summaries in the two first quarters of the fiscal year were delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The ERC was 100% on target for the 3rd and 4th quarter.
Met
2021-22≥ 4%202284%
We were 100% through 3 quarters and then missed Q4 due to web migration
Met
2022-23≥ 4%2023100%Met
2023-24≥ 4%2024100%Met
2024-25≥ 100%2025100%Met
Legal analyses include an assessment of essential facts, considerations and options.
Expected result: Thorough and expert legal analysis supports the drafting of findings and recommendations for each referred case.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21– no result100%2021-22✓ met100%2022-23✓ met100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 100%2021—
New process efficiencies shortened the time to complete analysis of cases without negatively impacting the ERC’s ability to provide extensive independent and impartial review of the cases referred to it.
No result reported
2021-22≥ 100%2022100%Met
2022-23≥ 100%2023100%Met
2023-24≥ 100%2024100%Met
2024-25≥ 100%2025100%Met
Percentage of findings and recommendations that are issued within the service standard.
Expected result: Findings and recommendations are issued in a timely manner.
0%2019-20✗ not met100%2020-21– no result0%2021-22✗ not met100%2022-23✓ met100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%20200%
ERC will establish service standards in 2020-21.
Not met
2020-21≥ 100%2021—
Not applicable (Reporting period starting in 2022-23)
No result reported
2021-22≥ 100%20220%
Not applicable (Reporting period starting in 2022 23)
Not met
2022-23≥ 100%2023100%Met
2023-24≥ 100%2024100%Met
2024-25≥ 100%2025100%Met
Pre-screening is initiated within 30 days of receipt of a file from the RCMP. Pre-screening reports are completed within 3 days after initiation.
Expected result: Timely identification of key case issues to support file management.
96%2019-20✗ not met85%2020-21✗ not met98%2021-22✗ not met100%2022-23✓ met100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%202096%
In 2019-2020, in order to improve its efficiency, the ERC has focused on triaging cases that had not been pre-screened to identify key issues to support file management.
Not met
2020-21≥ 100%202185%
With the introduction of the new prescreening service standard, cases were prescreened in an average of 27 days.
Not met
2021-22≥ 100%202298%
During the 2021-2022 fiscal year, 98% of cases referred to the ERC were prescreened within 30 days of receipt
Not met
2022-23≥ 100%2023100%Met
2023-24≥ 100%2024100%Met
2024-25≥ 100%2025100%Met
Report addresses all ERC recommendations and key activities (e.g. management initiatives, outreach, communications).
Expected result: Parliamentarians and Canadians are informed of the ERC’s recommendations and activities.
12019-20✓ met1002020-21✓ met1002021-22✓ met1002022-23✓ met12023-24✓ met12024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 120201Met
2020-21≥ 12021100Met
2021-22≥ 12022100Met
2022-23≥ 12023100Met
2023-24≥ 120241Met
2024-25≥ 120251Met
The degree to which RCMP final decisions concord with ERC recommendations, expressed as the % of the RCMP final decisions that fully agree, partly agree or do not agree with the recommendations.
Expected result: Findings and recommendations support fair and transparent recourse processes and decision-making.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met100%2021-22✓ met100%2022-23✓ met100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%2020100%
Agreed in 82%, agreed in part in 4% and disagreed in 14%
Met
2020-21≥ 100%2021100%
Agreed in 76%, agreed in part in 0% and disagreed in 24%.
Met
2021-22≥ 100%2022100%
Agreed in 96% and disagreed in 4%.
Met
2022-23≥ 100%2023100%
90% fully agreed with the ERC’s findings and recommendations; 7% partly agreed; and, 3% did not agree
Met
2023-24≥ 100%2024100%
Agreed in 88%, partially agreed in 3%, and disagreed in 9%
Met
2024-25≥ 100%2025100%
2024–25: Agreed in 58%, partially agreed in 5% and disagreed in 37%
Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Frequency of website postings of the latest summaries of ERC findings and recommendations and of RCMP final decisions.
Expected result: RCMP members and the public have access to current information on the issues addressed by the ERC in its reviews.
100%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 100%2027—Planned
Legal analyses include an assessment of essential facts, considerations and options.
Expected result: Thorough and expert legal analysis supports the drafting of findings and recommendations for each referred case.
100%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 100%2027—Planned
Percentage of findings and recommendations that are issued within the service standard.
Expected result: Findings and recommendations are issued in a timely manner.
100%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 100%2027—Planned
Pre-screening is initiated within 30 days of receipt of a file from the RCMP. Pre-screening reports are completed within 3 days after initiation.
Expected result: Timely identification of key case issues to support file management.
100%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 100%2027—Planned
Report addresses all ERC recommendations and key activities (e.g. management initiatives, outreach, communications).
Expected result: Parliamentarians and Canadians are informed of the ERC’s recommendations and activities.
12026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 12027—Planned
The degree to which RCMP final decisions concord with ERC recommendations, expressed as the % of the RCMP final decisions that fully agree, partly agree or do not agree with the recommendations.
Expected result: Findings and recommendations support fair and transparent recourse processes and decision-making.
100%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 100%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2019-20: $3.4M2019-20: $3.1M2019-202020-21: $3.2M2020-21: $3.2M2020-212021-22: $6.4M2021-22: $3.9M2021-222022-23: $6.4M2022-23: $4.9M2022-232023-24: $6.5M2023-24: $3.9M2023-242024-25: $4.6M2024-25: $5M2024-252025-26: $4.8M2025-262026-27: $4.6M2026-272027-28: $4.6M2027-282028-29: $4.5M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2019-20$3.4M$3.1M
2020-21$3.2M$3.2M
2021-22$6.4M$3.9M
2022-23$6.4M$4.9M
2023-24$6.5M$3.9M
2024-25$4.6M$5M
2025-26$4.8M—
2026-27$4.6M—
2027-28$4.6M*—
2028-29$4.5M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2019-20: 172019-20: 152019-202020-21: 172020-21: 172020-212021-22: 332021-22: 222021-222022-23: 332022-23: 242022-232023-24: 332023-24: 212023-242024-25: 242024-25: 192024-252025-26: 182025-262026-27: 172026-272027-28: 172027-282028-29: 152028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2019-201715
2020-211717
2021-223322
2022-233324
2023-243321
2024-252419
2025-2618—
2026-2717—
2027-2817*—
2028-2915*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.