Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada

Supervision Program

Program code
BUW01 (FTRAC)
Core responsibility
Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Legislation and Regulations
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

The Supervision Program ensures compliance with Part 1 and Part 1.1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and associated Regulations. The Program, enabled by strategic policy, strategic intelligence, research and analytics, utilizes a risk-based approach to deliver monitoring enforcing and engaging activities that help ensure compliance with legislative and regulatory obligations that apply to persons and entities operating in Canada’s financial system and subject to the PCMLTFA. Through this program, FINTRAC enhances public awareness and understanding of matters related to money laundering, the financing of terrorist activities and sanctions evasion.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Supervision Program 2018-19: $17.1MSupervision Program 2019-20: $18.2MSupervision Program 2020-21: $19.6MSupervision Program 2021-22: $24.7MSupervision Program 2022-23: $26.8MSupervision Program 2023-24: $30.2MSupervision Program 2024-25: $46.1MSupervision Program 2025-26: $59.2MSupervision Program 2026-27: $85.3MSupervision Program 2027-28: $97.9MSupervision Program 2028-29: $94MSupervision ProgramCompliance ProgramSupervision P…
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data. The line at the bottom shows this program's names over time.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Supervision ProgramThis program2018-19 – 2028-29$183M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2020-21Indicators added: Percentage of assessed reporting entities not requiring enforcement action; Percentage of Financial Transaction Reports submitted to FINTRAC that meet validation rules as an indicator of qualityDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2020-21Indicators dropped: Percentage of Financial Transaction Reports submitted to FINTRAC that meet quality requirements; Percentage of follow-up examinations where reporting entities demonstrate higher rates of compliance with their money laundering and terrorism financing legislative and regulatory obligationsDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2021-22Employees (FTEs) 170, against 136 in 2020-21 (+25%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2021-22Spending $24.7M, against $19.6M in 2020-21 (+26%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2022-23Indicators dropped: Percentage of follow-up examinations where reporting entities demonstrate improvement in the quality of their reporting to FINTRACDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2023Budget 2023 measure “FINTRAC Funding”: -$26M in total over its years (linked to this program by name, a best-effort match).Budget 2023, PDF page 206
2024-25Employees (FTEs) 240, against 182 in 2023-24 (+32%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2024-25Spending $46.1M, against $30.2M in 2023-24 (+53%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2025-26Planned spending $59.2M, against $46.1M in 2024-25 (+28%).Latest Departmental Plan
2026-27Planned employees (FTEs) 356, against 272 in 2025-26 (+31%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2026-27Renamed from “Compliance Program” to “Supervision Program”.GC InfoBase program names by year
2026-27Planned spending $85.3M, against $59.2M in 2025-26 (+44%).Latest Departmental Plan

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of assessed reporting entities not requiring enforcement action
Expected result: Reporting entities are compliant with their anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations and requirements
94%2020-21✓ met94%2021-22✓ met95%2022-23✓ met89%2023-24✗ not met85%2024-25✗ not met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2020-21≥ 90%202194%Met
2021-22≥ 90%202294%Met
2022-23≥ 90%202395%Met
2023-24≥ 90%202489%
FINTRAC assessed the compliance of over 600 businesses through one or more types of assessment activity. Approximately 89% of businesses assessed by FINTRAC did not require enforcement action. This means that these assessments resulted in no further activity or in a follow-up activity instead of enforcement (e.g., data integrity monitoring, a follow-up assessment, an action plan, etc.).
Not met
2024-25≥ 90%202585%
FINTRAC’s shift toward preventative and enhanced risk-based oversight FINTRAC’s enhanced risk-based supervision means that it prioritizes early identification of risks. There is a continued and deliberate shift towards increased enforcement, which demonstrates a more assertive and proportionate prioritization of resources and efforts on higher risk areas. The number of assessment activities condu…
Not met
Percentage of Financial Transaction Reports submitted to FINTRAC that meet validation rules as an indicator of quality
Expected result: Reporting entities are compliant with their anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations and requirements
88%2020-21✗ not met87%2021-22✗ not met90%2022-23✓ met70%2023-24✗ not met90%2024-25– no result

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2020-21≥ 90%202188%
The global pandemic had a significant impact on FINTRAC’s approach to compliance over the past year. The Centre, however, effectively mobilized its operations in order to deliver on its critical compliance mandate. This included working closely with businesses to minimize the impact of their regulatory requirements, given the challenging circumstances, while ensuring that FINTRAC was still able t…
Not met
2021-22≥ 90%202287%
The global pandemic had a significant impact on FINTRAC’s approach to compliance over the past year. The Centre, however, effectively mobilized its operations in order to deliver on its critical compliance mandate. This included working closely with businesses to minimize the impact of their regulatory requirements, given the challenging circumstances, while ensuring that FINTRAC was still able t…
Not met
2022-23≥ 90%202390%Met
2023-24≥ 90%202470%
Due to legislative and regulatory changes, such as but not limited to the amended definition of an electronic funds transfer in April 2022, reporting requirements were introduced for new reporting entities that were previously not obligated to report to FINTRAC. Additionally, FINTRAC continued the modernization of its reporting forms due to regulatory amendments that came into force in 2021. Thes…
Not met
2024-25≥ 90%2025—
Supporting data for this indicator is not available. Measurement will resume in 2025–26
No result reported
Percentage of follow-up examinations where reporting entities demonstrate improvement in the quality of their reporting to FINTRAC
Expected result: Reporting entities are compliant with their anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations and requirements
100%2018-19✓ met76%2019-20✗ not met0%2020-21✗ not met0%2021-22✗ not met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 80%2019100%Met
2019-20≥ 80%202076%
FINTRAC noted a 76 percent improvement in reporting quality from reporting entities after a follow-up examination.
Not met
2020-21≥ 90%20210%
Due to the pandemic, follow-up examinations were not conducted for this period
Not met
2021-22≥ 90%20220%
Due to the pandemic, follow-up examinations were not conducted for this period
Not met
Percentage of Financial Transaction Reports submitted to FINTRAC that meet quality requirements
Expected result: Reporting entities meet their reporting obligations to FINTRAC and provide accurate transaction data that can be used to produce actionable financial intelligence.
91.7%2018-19✓ met88.1%2019-20✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 80%201991.7%Met
2019-20≥ 80%202088.1%Met
Percentage of follow-up examinations where reporting entities demonstrate higher rates of compliance with their money laundering and terrorism financing legislative and regulatory obligations
Expected result: Reporting entities understand their role and contribution in combating money laundering and terrorist activity financing
79%2018-19✗ not met88.6%2019-20✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 80%201979%
Follow-up examinations are an assessment tool that FINTRAC can use, when appropriate, to assess if a business has addressed previous non-compliance. In 2018–19, the Centre conducted 19 follow-up examinations and identified improvement in compliance behaviour in 79 percent of cases over the previous examination. In instances where a negative change in behavior (21 percent) was observed, additional…
Not met
2019-20≥ 80%202088.6%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of assessed reporting entities not requiring enforcement action
Expected result: Reporting entities are compliant with their anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations and requirements
90%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 90%2027—Planned
Percentage of Financial Transaction Reports submitted to FINTRAC that meet validation rules as an indicator of quality
Expected result: Reporting entities are compliant with their anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations and requirements
90%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 90%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $16.6M2018-19: $17.1M2018-192019-20: $16.8M2019-20: $18.2M2019-202020-21: $23.2M2020-21: $19.6M2020-212021-22: $28M2021-22: $24.7M2021-222022-23: $24.5M2022-23: $26.8M2022-232023-24: $30.2M2023-24: $30.2M2023-242024-25: $48.4M2024-25: $46.1M2024-252025-26: $59.2M2025-262026-27: $85.3M2026-272027-28: $97.9M2027-282028-29: $94M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$16.6M$17.1M
2019-20$16.8M$18.2M
2020-21$23.2M$19.6M
2021-22$28M$24.7M
2022-23$24.5M$26.8M
2023-24$30.2M$30.2M
2024-25$48.4M$46.1M
2025-26$59.2M—
2026-27$85.3M—
2027-28$97.9M*—
2028-29$94M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 1222018-19: 1272018-192019-20: 1232019-20: 1252019-202020-21: 1262020-21: 1362020-212021-22: 1342021-22: 1702021-222022-23: 1432022-23: 1782022-232023-24: 1762023-24: 1822023-242024-25: 2672024-25: 2402024-252025-26: 2722025-262026-27: 3562026-272027-28: 3902027-282028-29: 3812028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19122127
2019-20123125
2020-21126136
2021-22134170
2022-23143178
2023-24176182
2024-25267240
2025-26272—
2026-27356—
2027-28390*—
2028-29381*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.