Public Service Labour Relations Board
What Public Service Labour Relations Board spent in fiscal year 2006-07: its net expenditure by standard object, from the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II.
Reports through Canadian Heritage; the overview shows it in that ministry.
Spending, 2006-07
Net spending, 2006-07
$10.4M
spent by Public Service Labour Relations Board, less revenues it kept
Share, 2006-07
0.0%
of the net spending of every federal organization
How did Public Service Labour Relations Board spend its budget in 2006-07?
By standard object. Revenues it kept are negative and netted against its spending.
Spending by standard object, 2006-07
Personnel
Professional and special services
Transportation and communications
Acquisition of machinery and equipment
Information
Rentals
Utilities, materials and supplies
Repair and maintenance
Other subsidies and payments
$7.1M
$1.5M
$577K
$444K
$323K
$275K
$193K
$23K
-$45K
Total: $10.4M.
Workforce, 2006-07
Personnel spending
$7.1M
salaries, wages and benefits (the personnel standard object)
A full-time equivalent is a measure of employment, not a headcount: two half-time employees are one FTE. Personnel spending includes benefits and pension contributions, so per FTE it is not an average salary.
Public Service Labour Relations Board’s share of federal net spending
Other organizations in Canadian Heritage
- Canadian Heritage
- Women and Gender Equality Canada
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Canada Council for the Arts
- Library and Archives Canada
- Telefilm Canada
- Public Service Commission of Canada
- National Film Board
- Canadian Museum of History
- Canadian Museum of Nature
- National Arts Centre Corporation
- National Gallery of Canada
- National Museum of Science and Technology
- The National Battlefields Commission
- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
- Public Service Staffing Tribunal
Sources
Department figures are net expenditure (Public Accounts, Volume II), which doesn’t add up to the accrual expenses of the overview’s headline. See the methodology.