Public Service Staffing Tribunal
What Public Service Staffing Tribunal spent in fiscal year 2009-10: its net expenditure by standard object, from the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II.
Reports through Canadian Heritage; the overview shows it in that ministry.
Spending, 2009-10
Net spending, 2009-10
$4.9M
spent by Public Service Staffing Tribunal, less revenues it kept
Share, 2009-10
0.0%
of the net spending of every federal organization
How did Public Service Staffing Tribunal spend its budget in 2009-10?
By standard object. Revenues it kept are negative and netted against its spending.
Spending by standard object, 2009-10
Personnel
Professional and special services
Transportation and communications
Other subsidies and payments
Rentals
Information
Utilities, materials and supplies
Acquisition of machinery and equipment
Repair and maintenance
$3.9M
$339K
$224K
$195K
$172K
$45K
$29K
$17K
$5K
Total: $4.9M.
Workforce, 2009-10
Personnel spending
$3.9M
salaries, wages and benefits (the personnel standard object)
A full-time equivalent is a measure of employment, not a headcount: two half-time employees are one FTE. Personnel spending includes benefits and pension contributions, so per FTE it is not an average salary.
Public Service Staffing Tribunal’s share of federal net spending
Other organizations in Canadian Heritage
- Canadian Heritage
- Women and Gender Equality Canada
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Canada Council for the Arts
- Library and Archives Canada
- Public Service Commission of Canada
- Telefilm Canada
- National Film Board
- Canadian Museum of History
- National Gallery of Canada
- National Museum of Science and Technology
- National Arts Centre Corporation
- Canadian Museum of Nature
- Canadian Museum for Human Rights
- Public Service Labour Relations Board
- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
- The National Battlefields Commission
- Registry of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal
Sources
Department figures are net expenditure (Public Accounts, Volume II), which doesn’t add up to the accrual expenses of the overview’s headline. See the methodology.
