Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal
What Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal spent in fiscal year 2013-14: its net expenditure by standard object, from the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II.
Reports through Indian Affairs and Northern Development; the overview shows it in that ministry.
Spending, 2013-14
Net spending, 2013-14
$2.1M
spent by Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal, less revenues it kept
Share, 2013-14
0.0%
of the net spending of every federal organization
How did Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal spend its budget in 2013-14?
By standard object. Revenues it kept are negative and netted against its spending.
Spending by standard object, 2013-14
Personnel
Rentals
Professional and special services
Transportation and communications
Acquisition of machinery and equipment
Utilities, materials and supplies
Repair and maintenance
$1.1M
$341K
$326K
$270K
$39K
$15K
$11K
Total: $2.1M.
Spending by program, 2013-14
The same net spending by program, as GC InfoBase reports program actuals: $2.1M in all. Select a program for its history, plans and results.
$1.6M
$585K
Workforce, 2013-14
Full-time equivalents
12
the actual FTEs of its programs, as GC InfoBase reports them
Personnel spending
$1.1M
salaries, wages and benefits (the personnel standard object)
Personnel spending per FTE
$96K
personnel spending divided by full-time equivalents
A full-time equivalent is a measure of employment, not a headcount: two half-time employees are one FTE. Personnel spending includes benefits and pension contributions, so per FTE it is not an average salary.
Registry of the Specific Claims Tribunal’s share of federal net spending
Other organizations in Indian Affairs and Northern Development
Sources
- Public Accounts of Canada 2014, Volume II: Ministerial expenditures by standard object (Table 3)
- GC InfoBase – Federal Programs – Actual and Planned Spending (programs_spending.csv)
- GC InfoBase – Federal Programs – Actual and Planned Employees (programs_ftes.csv)
Department figures are net expenditure (Public Accounts, Volume II), which doesn’t add up to the accrual expenses of the overview’s headline. See the methodology.
