Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada
What Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada spent in fiscal year 2013-14: its net expenditure by standard object, from the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II.
Reports through Transport; the overview shows it in that ministry.
Spending, 2013-14
Net spending, 2013-14
$1.5M
spent by Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada, less revenues it kept
Share, 2013-14
0.0%
of the net spending of every federal organization
How did Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada spend its budget in 2013-14?
By standard object. Revenues it kept are negative and netted against its spending.
Spending by standard object, 2013-14
Personnel
Professional and special services
Transportation and communications
Acquisition of machinery and equipment
Rentals
Utilities, materials and supplies
Information
$900K
$406K
$106K
$25K
$20K
$13K
$1K
Total: $1.5M.
Spending by program, 2013-14
The same net spending by program, as GC InfoBase reports program actuals: $1.5M in all. Select a program for its history, plans and results.
Workforce, 2013-14
Full-time equivalents
11
the actual FTEs of its programs, as GC InfoBase reports them
Personnel spending
$900K
salaries, wages and benefits (the personnel standard object)
Personnel spending per FTE
$82K
personnel spending divided by full-time equivalents
A full-time equivalent is a measure of employment, not a headcount: two half-time employees are one FTE. Personnel spending includes benefits and pension contributions, so per FTE it is not an average salary.
Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada’s share of federal net spending
Other organizations in Transport
Sources
- Public Accounts of Canada 2014, Volume II: Ministerial expenditures by standard object (Table 3)
- GC InfoBase – Federal Programs – Actual and Planned Spending (programs_spending.csv)
- GC InfoBase – Federal Programs – Actual and Planned Employees (programs_ftes.csv)
Department figures are net expenditure (Public Accounts, Volume II), which doesn’t add up to the accrual expenses of the overview’s headline. See the methodology.
